Excerpt:
In the 60 years since the establishment of the state of Israel,
attempts to present in print an account of Palestinian history
and Palestinian rights have usually been met by swift and highly
organised protests. Protesters have written in their hundreds
to journals and newspapers, often using arguments supplied by
a central publicity machine and phrased in suspiciously similar
terms. These campaigns, and similar campaigns launched against
publications that print material critical of Israel, seem fundamentally
different from the normal discourse between readers and the
publications they read. The constant use of denial rather than
argument; the demands for an apology or even the editor’s
resignation; the enlisting of people who have never read, or
even heard, of the publication in question; and the recourse
to obscenity and accusations of antisemitism all go far beyond
the average heated but civilised debate one expects to find
in a scientific or medical journal.
Read more @ PULSE