cue the lightning bolts

the only question that matters: is it true?

Iran has signed the NPT. As a signatory to the NPT, Iran may rightfully, legally, use nuclear technology for peaceful energy purposes. Iran has submitted to and passed repeated IAEA inspections. The US intelligence community (NIE) does not consider Iran a nuclear threat. Israel refuses to sign the NPT. Israel has an estimated several hundred undeclared nuclear weapons. Russia and China have warned that an attack on Iran will have global consequences. That's the situation in a nutshell. Where to next, people? Where to?

Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth? - Galatians 4:16

10.21.2009

Corporate media, SPLC setting up Oath Keepers to be a scapegoat next?

Yesterday I posted a story from the Las Vegas Review Journal about the Oath Keepers, in which the author a Mr. Alan Maimon (a Jewish surname, like Maimonides), presents the Oath Keepers as a controversial organization and offers rebuttal from the Jewish-founded Southern Poverty Law Center.

aangirfan has a piece here about a possible military coup by 2012, an idea perhaps 20 years in the making.

In 1992, General Colin Powell, chairman of the joint chiefs, "awarded the prize for his strategy essay competition at the National Defence University to Lieutenant Colonel Charles Dunlap for The Origins of the American Military Coup of 2012.
...
"General Franks, the CENTCOM general who led the military campaign into Iraq, pointed in an October 2003 interview to the role of what he called a 'massive casualty-producing event'." (Coup d'Etat in America?)

According to Franks: "a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event [will occur] somewhere in the Western world - it may be in the United States of America - that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event." (Coup d'Etat in America?)

So...a mass casualty "terrorist" event leads to a military coup and this has been envisioned by the Army War College.

The "terrorists" being run by the US military, natch.

MEANWHILE, Oath Keepers looks to be a legitimate grass-roots organization of people who actually believe in the Constitution.

BUT if something goes wrong, they will make a GREAT SCAPEGOAT for people who don't like the "terrorist" inspired military dictatorship.

And I think that's what this trashing of Oath Keepers is all about, to discredit this legitimate organization in preparation for blaming them and linking them to people like Timothy McVeigh, who was probably a government mind-control tool.

CHRIS MATTHEWS that piece of shit takes it upon himself to sloppily recite while spitting and drooling his "slides" about Oath Keepers, interrupting and misdirecting, avoiding anything pertinent and twisting the conversation down some back alley where legitimate resistance becomes linked to right wing militia groups. Chris ridicules people who worry about the Constitution. Chris accuses Oath Keepers of creating a "state of mind" OMG!!! PROJECT MUCH you lying sack of shit?!?!?!?

Then he sucks up to the pinhead from SPLC who also links them to militia groups and conspiracy theorists and it's all DANGEROUS to our society. LIKE THE GUY WHO BROKE INTO THE HOLOCAUST MUSEUM AND SHOT THE GUARD, LIKE TIMOTHY MCVEIGH, CHRIS MATTHEWS HELPFULLY ADDS.




No comments:

legal mumbo jumbo

Disclaimer: The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.